Comments for Cognizant Transmutation http://blog.ibd.com Internet Bandwidth Development: Composting the Internet for over Two Decades Sat, 07 Jan 2012 01:36:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on Bonjour / AVAHI & Netatalk to share files files between Ubuntu 10.4 & Mac OS X by Robert J Berger http://blog.ibd.com/howto/bonjour-avahi-netatalk-to-share-files-files-between-ubuntu-10-4-mac-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-4366 Robert J Berger Sat, 07 Jan 2012 01:36:09 +0000 http://blog.ibd.com/?p=574#comment-4366 I believe this is normal behavior of modern OS's assuming that the Memory utilization shows that the memory is mostly in the cached memory. If you run the free command you'll see something like: <pre><code> # free -m total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 15011 10128 4882 0 200 4783 -/+ buffers/cache: 5145 9865 </code></pre> Notice that the cached value is pretty high. If you see that the free value is low and the cached value is high, that is cool. The OS is sucking any idle memory and using it for disk and other caches. But if a process needs memory, it will take it from the cache, not declare its out of memory. This is generally a good thing. So when you do a big transfer it will allocate the memory to caches and then lazily release the caches only when processes need it. If you see low "free" memory AND low "cached" memory, then you might have a problem... I believe this is normal behavior of modern OS’s assuming that the Memory utilization shows that the memory is mostly in the cached memory. If you run the free command you’ll see something like:


# free -m
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:         15011      10128       4882          0        200       4783
-/+ buffers/cache:       5145       9865

Notice that the cached value is pretty high. If you see that the free value is low and the cached value is high, that is cool. The OS is sucking any idle memory and using it for disk and other caches. But if a process needs memory, it will take it from the cache, not declare its out of memory. This is generally a good thing. So when you do a big transfer it will allocate the memory to caches and then lazily release the caches only when processes need it.

If you see low “free” memory AND low “cached” memory, then you might have a problem…

]]> Comment on Your Mac Won’t Reboot when Installing Mac OS X Lion – Reset Your PRAM by Robert J Berger http://blog.ibd.com/howto/your-mac-wont-reboot-when-installing-mac-os-x-lion-reset-your-pram/comment-page-1/#comment-4365 Robert J Berger Sat, 07 Jan 2012 01:30:16 +0000 http://blog.ibd.com/?p=782#comment-4365 There doesn't seem to be any danger doing the PRAM reset often other than the hassle and like you said the suspicion that something is bad requiring this. The only problem I've had before and after the Lion upgrade that has been causing me to do a PRAM reset has been bluetooth freezing up. It happens to me several times a month if I'm using bluetooth headset to stream music. The system thinks there is no bluetooth hardware. I find if it gets in that state I have to shutdown and do a PRAM reset.... There doesn’t seem to be any danger doing the PRAM reset often other than the hassle and like you said the suspicion that something is bad requiring this.

The only problem I’ve had before and after the Lion upgrade that has been causing me to do a PRAM reset has been bluetooth freezing up. It happens to me several times a month if I’m using bluetooth headset to stream music. The system thinks there is no bluetooth hardware. I find if it gets in that state I have to shutdown and do a PRAM reset….

]]> Comment on Your Mac Won’t Reboot when Installing Mac OS X Lion – Reset Your PRAM by max http://blog.ibd.com/howto/your-mac-wont-reboot-when-installing-mac-os-x-lion-reset-your-pram/comment-page-1/#comment-4363 max Fri, 06 Jan 2012 14:29:06 +0000 http://blog.ibd.com/?p=782#comment-4363 OK. similar problem here. several macs updated to lion via thumb drive start up etc that went perfectly. Then I tried to do CLEAN Lion install as my main book was giving me various problems. could not get it to launch properly (from the Lion thumb drive) to save my life. More trouble shooting and test of different drives when PRAM issue came to light and I got it to load smoothly with alt drive. So...the original hard drive was now suspect. I go out and get new one, load it and first attempt to run Lion install and I get a hang up on install. UGHH...thought we had this beat. Then I went straight to PRAM reset again and violla....smooth install. So new HD is running and PRAM hint is big deal when you run into Lion on top of lion clean install and having basic launching problems. My concern is to whether or not I now have some more basic problem in the machine that is requiring PRAM resets and if it is going to become an ongoing issue, if that's even possible and what it might portend?? Nice article and thanks for any feedback. MS OK. similar problem here. several macs updated to lion via thumb drive start up etc that went perfectly.

Then I tried to do CLEAN Lion install as my main book was giving me various problems. could not get it to launch properly (from the Lion thumb drive) to save my life. More trouble shooting and test of different drives when PRAM issue came to light and I got it to load smoothly with alt drive. So…the original hard drive was now suspect. I go out and get new one, load it and first attempt to run Lion install and I get a hang up on install. UGHH…thought we had this beat. Then I went straight to PRAM reset again and violla….smooth install.

So new HD is running and PRAM hint is big deal when you run into Lion on top of lion clean install and having basic launching problems. My concern is to whether or not I now have some more basic problem in the machine that is requiring PRAM resets and if it is going to become an ongoing issue, if that’s even possible and what it might portend??

Nice article and thanks for any feedback. MS

]]> Comment on Bonjour / AVAHI & Netatalk to share files files between Ubuntu 10.4 & Mac OS X by Paresh Rana http://blog.ibd.com/howto/bonjour-avahi-netatalk-to-share-files-files-between-ubuntu-10-4-mac-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-4214 Paresh Rana Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:38:07 +0000 http://blog.ibd.com/?p=574#comment-4214 You Rock! I too found other article to refer to and use older versions of Ubuntu Server and am always a little cautious to follow this instructions. Thank you for making the time and effort to provide a simple and succinct solution that worked for me like a charm. One thing I did notice on my Ubuntu box though... I did some throughput tests by copying a 2Gb folder/directory of files from my Mac to the server. I watched the men utilization on the server (which has 4Gb of RAM) and noticed that as the files were copying the men utilization climbed till it reached a little less that 4Gb. After 12 hours, it has not dropped back down. Do you know if there is some kind of caching going on that might have flush parameters for afp? PS: I am amazed with the > 4Gb/min (66MB/s) throughput to the server I am getting. Thank you again. You Rock! I too found other article to refer to and use older versions of Ubuntu Server and am always a little cautious to follow this instructions. Thank you for making the time and effort to provide a simple and succinct solution that worked for me like a charm.

One thing I did notice on my Ubuntu box though… I did some throughput tests by copying a 2Gb folder/directory of files from my Mac to the server. I watched the men utilization on the server (which has 4Gb of RAM) and noticed that as the files were copying the men utilization climbed till it reached a little less that 4Gb. After 12 hours, it has not dropped back down.

Do you know if there is some kind of caching going on that might have flush parameters for afp?

PS: I am amazed with the > 4Gb/min (66MB/s) throughput to the server I am getting.

Thank you again.

]]> Comment on Power in Numbers: China Aims for High-Tech Primacy by Thomas http://blog.ibd.com/how-the-world-works/demand_transformation/power-in-numbers-china-aims-for-high-tech-primacy/comment-page-1/#comment-4116 Thomas Sat, 17 Dec 2011 12:40:27 +0000 http://blog.ibd.com/how-the-world-works/demand_transformation/power-in-numbers-china-aims-for-high-tech-primacy/#comment-4116 Our confidence that we will remain the world's premer power because the PRC is not a free system may be badly misplaced. The Chinese Empire was the world's most technologically advanced society - and probably its most repressive, as there was practically nothing to check the Emperor's will. More recently, Germany's Third Reich was in its time the world's most technologically advanced society - Fortunately for us, the only thing it failed to fully develop was the atomic bomb. The PRC wil give us a hell of a contest. We HAVE to think of the future and aggressively invest in it, even as our economy is in the doldrums. ESPECIALLY as our economy is in the doldrums If we worry about tax cuts and deregulation now instead of building a future, we will be toast. And we will be toast sooner rather than later. And the only shovel ready project for us twenty years from now is us digging our own graves. The PRC super computers are right now on a par with us. The national security implication is that they can crack encryption with the same efficiency as ours. And that's just the beginning. We have only begun to scratch the surface of artificial intelligence, for example. If the focus of our society continues to be on low taxes, deregulation and small government, we are dead meat. And by the way, a government that is small enough to be drowned in a bath tub would have doomed our cause in WWII. Let alone the Cold War. We can hold on to the torch only if we run fast enough with it. Our confidence that we will remain the world’s premer power because the PRC is not a free system may be badly misplaced. The Chinese Empire was the world’s most technologically advanced society – and probably its most repressive, as there was practically nothing to check the Emperor’s will. More recently, Germany’s Third Reich was in its time the world’s most technologically advanced society – Fortunately for us, the only thing it failed to fully develop was the atomic bomb.

The PRC wil give us a hell of a contest. We HAVE to think of the future and aggressively invest in it, even as our economy is in the doldrums. ESPECIALLY as our economy is in the doldrums If we worry about tax cuts and deregulation now instead of building a future, we will be toast. And we will be toast sooner rather than later. And the only shovel ready project for us twenty years from now is us digging our own graves.

The PRC super computers are right now on a par with us. The national security implication is that they can crack encryption with the same efficiency as ours. And that’s just the beginning. We have only begun to scratch the surface of artificial intelligence, for example. If the focus of our society continues to be on low taxes, deregulation and small government, we are dead meat. And by the way, a government that is small enough to be drowned in a bath tub would have doomed our cause in WWII. Let alone the Cold War.

We can hold on to the torch only if we run fast enough with it.

]]> Comment on The Icelandic Model of Handling Debt Crises: Make the Banks Fail and the Creditors Pay by spiritofjubilee http://blog.ibd.com/how-the-world-works/demand_transformation/the-icelandic-model-of-handling-debt-crises-make-the-banks-fail-and-the-creditors-pay/comment-page-1/#comment-4007 spiritofjubilee Thu, 15 Dec 2011 02:02:49 +0000 http://blog.ibd.com/how-the-world-works/demand_transformation/the-icelandic-model-of-handling-debt-crises-make-the-banks-fail-and-the-creditors-pay/#comment-4007 Hey There Blog, Interesting Post, As the economic downturn has progressed, credit repair companies (as well as credit repair scams) have proliferated. Given that the credit information industry is a multi-billion dollar annual business, it has become more important that you understand the laws that protect you in your transactions with corporate interests. Regards In America: governments, businesses, individuals are now buried under a mountain of debt. A mountain of debt that will never be repaid. Who will borrow when they can't make the payments on the debt that they have already? The math alone calls for a system reset, a debt jubilee. Investors are already losing... in a rigged monetary casino that rewards usury, speculation, and currency manipulation while looting main street. There is a moral principle that debts should be honored. That is, debts between businesses that buy and sell real products, not bundled ponzi schemes, debts between individuals, between friends and businesses that know each other to be rational and moral, debts based on investments where there is a rational expectation of return. There is also a moral principle that unjust debts should be cancelled, and usury legislated against. Debts that are 'odious', debts based on fraud, debts to dictators, debts arranged by oligarchs without the consent of the general population (the 99 percent who have been left out of the equation), debts based upon compound interest upon compound interest, that should have been written off long ago, the debts need to be cancelled in a general jubilee. Think outside the box. It's time for a jubilee. Hey There Blog,
Interesting Post, As the economic downturn has progressed, credit repair companies (as well as credit repair scams) have proliferated. Given that the credit information industry is a multi-billion dollar annual business, it has become more important that you understand the laws that protect you in your transactions with corporate interests.
Regards
In America: governments, businesses, individuals are now buried under a mountain of debt. A mountain of debt that will never be repaid.

Who will borrow when they can’t make the payments on the debt that they have already? The math alone calls for a system reset, a debt jubilee.

Investors are already losing… in a rigged monetary casino that rewards usury, speculation, and currency manipulation while looting main street.

There is a moral principle that debts should be honored. That is, debts between businesses that buy and sell real products, not bundled ponzi schemes, debts between individuals, between friends and businesses that know each other to be rational and moral, debts based on investments where there is a rational expectation of return.

There is also a moral principle that unjust debts should be cancelled, and usury legislated against. Debts that are ‘odious’, debts based on fraud, debts to dictators, debts arranged by oligarchs without the consent of the general population (the 99 percent who have been left out of the equation), debts based upon compound interest upon compound interest, that should have been written off long ago, the debts need to be cancelled in a general jubilee. Think outside the box. It’s time for a jubilee.

]]> Comment on Totally Ignorant Article By Michael Lind on “Who’s Afraid of the AT&T Merger” by Robert J Berger http://blog.ibd.com/telecom/totally-ignorant-article-by-michael-lind-on-whos-afraid-of-the-att-merger/comment-page-1/#comment-2841 Robert J Berger Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:26:58 +0000 http://blog.ibd.com/?p=837#comment-2841 The article on fascism was very interesting, so I don't really understand what you are proposing and what you are objecting about my proposals. AT&T has to be the ultimate incarnation of what you complain of. They use the government to enforce their monopoly. They don't build what is needed but what will reinforce their control of communications and allow them to maintain monopoly rents. So I don't see how you can defend the status quo on one hand and then attack any proposal to open up the communications infrastructure that remove monopoly control. Monopoly rents are the worse kind of tax. It forces people to pay for systems that enslave them further. And from a logistics point of view you have to build out a fiber optic plant to deploy so much bandwidth to every square mile of coverage area. So a proper use of capital would be to deploy fiber to supply neighborhoods with GBytes of fibered coverage to homes and businesses AND deploy wireless for the nomadic usages. The incremental cost is small if done right AND it can create markets to implement all but the physical plant. Note that I have been involved with the design and building out of various Internet infrastructures both wired and wireless from 1993 thru 2007. I've watched the telecommunications transformations from total monopoly to open and innovative (which I had worked to accelerate and maintain) to watch it slip back to an even worse oligopoly. If not stopped, there will no longer be an open Internet as the oligopolies of ATT/Verizon/Comcast combine with the RIAA/MPAA to make the US Internet even more controlled than the Chinese Internet. See <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/11/hollywood-new-war-on-software-freedom-and-internet-innovation" rel="nofollow">Hollywood's New War on Software Freedom and Internet Innovation</a> The article on Fascism had a very accurate diagnosis of the situation, but had no discussion on how it could be changed or what a positive environment should be. I believe that one of the big problems of today is that there is almost NO vision for a positive future. There is not even a language to describe how a world based on abundance would work. One of the key issues is to come up with institutions that can properly balance public commons with private/market based mechanisms. The proposal that the physical plant of telecommunications should be treated as a public good and as substrate for private / market services is one such attempt for exploring those possibilities. It is clear that the total "private" ownership by the same entity that controls transport and content is a huge failure and must be disrupted if we have any hope for personal freedom let alone innovation. The article on fascism was very interesting, so I don’t really understand what you are proposing and what you are objecting about my proposals. AT&T has to be the ultimate incarnation of what you complain of. They use the government to enforce their monopoly. They don’t build what is needed but what will reinforce their control of communications and allow them to maintain monopoly rents. So I don’t see how you can defend the status quo on one hand and then attack any proposal to open up the communications infrastructure that remove monopoly control. Monopoly rents are the worse kind of tax. It forces people to pay for systems that enslave them further.

And from a logistics point of view you have to build out a fiber optic plant to deploy so much bandwidth to every square mile of coverage area. So a proper use of capital would be to deploy fiber to supply neighborhoods with GBytes of fibered coverage to homes and businesses AND deploy wireless for the nomadic usages. The incremental cost is small if done right AND it can create markets to implement all but the physical plant.

Note that I have been involved with the design and building out of various Internet infrastructures both wired and wireless from 1993 thru 2007. I’ve watched the telecommunications transformations from total monopoly to open and innovative (which I had worked to accelerate and maintain) to watch it slip back to an even worse oligopoly. If not stopped, there will no longer be an open Internet as the oligopolies of ATT/Verizon/Comcast combine with the RIAA/MPAA to make the US Internet even more controlled than the Chinese Internet. See Hollywood’s New War on Software Freedom and Internet Innovation

The article on Fascism had a very accurate diagnosis of the situation, but had no discussion on how it could be changed or what a positive environment should be. I believe that one of the big problems of today is that there is almost NO vision for a positive future. There is not even a language to describe how a world based on abundance would work.

One of the key issues is to come up with institutions that can properly balance public commons with private/market based mechanisms. The proposal that the physical plant of telecommunications should be treated as a public good and as substrate for private / market services is one such attempt for exploring those possibilities. It is clear that the total “private” ownership by the same entity that controls transport and content is a huge failure and must be disrupted if we have any hope for personal freedom let alone innovation.

]]> Comment on Totally Ignorant Article By Michael Lind on “Who’s Afraid of the AT&T Merger” by Bob http://blog.ibd.com/telecom/totally-ignorant-article-by-michael-lind-on-whos-afraid-of-the-att-merger/comment-page-1/#comment-2639 Bob Wed, 09 Nov 2011 20:17:37 +0000 http://blog.ibd.com/?p=837#comment-2639 I think you're confusing recitation of technical specs with solving problems. I'm talking about the ability to decide what the right investment for the next decade and beyond will be. Your approach (force of law) doesn't promote creative solutions to real problems. I'm sure it would bring you satisfaction in your quest for revenge, but I don't want to live in your world. I just laughed at the thought that you can't even be sure of the right transport mechanism in your last sentence. That's a typical shortcoming with the God complex or people that use the coercive force of government for personal ambitions. Give me the name and capital investment of the company who is working on the 25MBps wireless, and the timeframe at which it will be available. Explain the strategy to accelerate that time to market by 25% and the extra capital required to pull it off. Address the extra costs for a 50% faster-to-market solution. How much longer will it take if we force the diversion of investment to something else? Who will gain, and who will lose in that trade-off? What moral proposition justifies imposing that choice on the losers? Spell out the dollar-value of the opportunity cost everyone is required to pay for you to have your dream solution. Explain the demographic makeup of the people who chose to go home for broadband vs. the people who want to be free to receive it anywhere anytime. Justify your rational for forcing one over the other based on verifiable data. The problem with your theories here is that it requires the whole of society to value only what you value, and requires large sums of capital be only deployed to the investments your narrow mind can comprehend. To put you at ease, I'll point out I am as narrow minded as you are. We are both plagued with the incapacity to see beyond what we can imagine. If other narrow minded folks like us can handle the cognitive dissonance, they might want to expose themselves to some thoughts that stretch the imagination. Tim Hartford offers some ideas on solving problems that go beyond simplistic approach of (watch out!!) the Fascist state. Ted Talk: http://www.ted.com/talks/tim_harford.html To really stretch one's abilities and to see a definition of Fascism that applies to this context: http://mises.org/daily/5634 I think you’re confusing recitation of technical specs with solving problems. I’m talking about the ability to decide what the right investment for the next decade and beyond will be. Your approach (force of law) doesn’t promote creative solutions to real problems. I’m sure it would bring you satisfaction in your quest for revenge, but I don’t want to live in your world. I just laughed at the thought that you can’t even be sure of the right transport mechanism in your last sentence. That’s a typical shortcoming with the God complex or people that use the coercive force of government for personal ambitions.

Give me the name and capital investment of the company who is working on the 25MBps wireless, and the timeframe at which it will be available. Explain the strategy to accelerate that time to market by 25% and the extra capital required to pull it off. Address the extra costs for a 50% faster-to-market solution. How much longer will it take if we force the diversion of investment to something else? Who will gain, and who will lose in that trade-off? What moral proposition justifies imposing that choice on the losers? Spell out the dollar-value of the opportunity cost everyone is required to pay for you to have your dream solution. Explain the demographic makeup of the people who chose to go home for broadband vs. the people who want to be free to receive it anywhere anytime. Justify your rational for forcing one over the other based on verifiable data.

The problem with your theories here is that it requires the whole of society to value only what you value, and requires large sums of capital be only deployed to the investments your narrow mind can comprehend. To put you at ease, I’ll point out I am as narrow minded as you are. We are both plagued with the incapacity to see beyond what we can imagine.

If other narrow minded folks like us can handle the cognitive dissonance, they might want to expose themselves to some thoughts that stretch the imagination. Tim Hartford offers some ideas on solving problems that go beyond simplistic approach of (watch out!!) the Fascist state.

Ted Talk: http://www.ted.com/talks/tim_harford.html

To really stretch one’s abilities and to see a definition of Fascism that applies to this context: http://mises.org/daily/5634

]]> Comment on Installing Apache Thrift on Ubuntu and Leopard by Robert J Berger http://blog.ibd.com/howto/installing-apache-thrift-on-ubuntu-and-leopard/comment-page-1/#comment-2290 Robert J Berger Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:38:24 +0000 http://blog.ibd.com/?p=172#comment-2290 Andres, I haven't played with this for a while. There are instructions for ubuntu at http://www.saltycrane.com/blog/2011/06/install-thrift-ubuntu-1010-maverick/ and now days you can install thrift with homebrew on the mac http://mxcl.github.com/homebrew/ Andres, I haven’t played with this for a while. There are instructions for ubuntu at http://www.saltycrane.com/blog/2011/06/install-thrift-ubuntu-1010-maverick/ and now days you can install thrift with homebrew on the mac http://mxcl.github.com/homebrew/

]]> Comment on Installing Apache Thrift on Ubuntu and Leopard by Andres http://blog.ibd.com/howto/installing-apache-thrift-on-ubuntu-and-leopard/comment-page-1/#comment-2287 Andres Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:48:25 +0000 http://blog.ibd.com/?p=172#comment-2287 Getting the following error: ==> jsx (compile) ./include/jsx_common.hrl:34: type jsx_opt() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:66: type jsx_parser_result() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:34: type jsx_opt() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:66: type jsx_parser_result() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:82: type eep0018_array() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:82: type eep0018_array() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:82: type eep0018_object() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:84: type eep0018_term() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:82: type eep0018_object() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:85: type eep0018_key() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:85: type eep0018_term() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:91: type eep0018_string() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:84: type eep0018_term() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:34: type jsx_opt() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:85: type eep0018_key() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:92: type eep0018_number() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:66: type jsx_parser_result() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:85: type eep0018_term() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:100: type encoder_opt() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:82: type eep0018_array() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:91: type eep0018_string() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:109: type decoder_opt() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:82: type eep0018_object() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:92: type eep0018_number() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:117: type verify_opt() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:84: type eep0018_term() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:100: type encoder_opt() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:123: type format_opt() undefined ./include/jsx_common.hrl:85: type eep0018_key() undefined make[2]: *** [all] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/hadoop-user/Software/thrift/lib/erl' make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/hadoop-user/Software/thrift/lib' make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 Getting the following error:

==> jsx (compile)
./include/jsx_common.hrl:34: type jsx_opt() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:66: type jsx_parser_result() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:34: type jsx_opt() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:66: type jsx_parser_result() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:82: type eep0018_array() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:82: type eep0018_array() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:82: type eep0018_object() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:84: type eep0018_term() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:82: type eep0018_object() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:85: type eep0018_key() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:85: type eep0018_term() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:91: type eep0018_string() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:84: type eep0018_term() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:34: type jsx_opt() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:85: type eep0018_key() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:92: type eep0018_number() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:66: type jsx_parser_result() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:85: type eep0018_term() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:100: type encoder_opt() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:82: type eep0018_array() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:91: type eep0018_string() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:109: type decoder_opt() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:82: type eep0018_object() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:92: type eep0018_number() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:117: type verify_opt() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:84: type eep0018_term() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:100: type encoder_opt() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:123: type format_opt() undefined
./include/jsx_common.hrl:85: type eep0018_key() undefined
make[2]: *** [all] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/hadoop-user/Software/thrift/lib/erl’
make[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/hadoop-user/Software/thrift/lib’
make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1

]]>